Reprobate & Depraved Minds

“Why are you always so surprised at this fiery trial”, asked the Apostle Paul, his question valid for all time. 1 Peter 4:12

I shouldn’t be, but I am, surprised that Christian friends are surprised by the amount and intensity of perversion spewed out against Sarah Palin, and to a lesser degree, John McCain. Talk shows, newspapers, magazines and comedy venues have reached a new low.

Let love be without hypocrisy, abhor what is evil. Cling to what is good….. Rom 12:9-10

Not that long ago, even the most wretched of souls would have exerted self-control, clamping their lips tightly together in the “mixed company” of those who held more conservative, less subversive views.

Gloria Steinem, Sarah Bernhardt, or Randi Rhodes, Steinem being the least offensive, and Bernhardt and Rhodes tied for needing the most prayer, are but a few examples of people who have shown themselves to be foolish in the eyes of the Lord, generating sickening comments over the last few weeks, their hatred stunning. They, with their peers, are bringing their picnic baskets to the Coliseum of the American media, feeding each others egos and sense of pride in that they, who consider themselves so noble, wise and worthy, are bolstering one another up in their starving frenzy with increasing rage, it seems only blood-soaked ground will satisfy.

When the Apostle Paul entered the world of Rome’s Stoicism and Epicureanism, carrying the startling message of Jesus Christ, he entered a world in which individual people were of little value.

In contrast to the Stoics, Paul taught that God is personal and not a part of this universe. He also taught that there would be a judgment to come, not a giant conflagration leading to another cycle.

Against the Epicureans, Paul taught that God is involved in the affairs of His creation and created us specifically to search for Him. Of course, Paul’s doctrine of a future judgment didn’t fit with their thinking either.

Roman society was in a downward spiral heading toward destruction, its leadership – August, Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius and Nero – each more perverse and hateful than the next. Two thousand years later, it is interesting to see how little has changed from the time of the burning of the second temple.

Clinton the adulterer, has served as our Caligula. Bush followed Clinton, just as Claudius followed Caligula, Claudius described in a Rome Forum as, “an inoffensive half-wit who was a convenient puppet to a competent imperial administration and benevolent praetorian guard who wanted a return to normalcy after Caligula’s excesses and so avoid losing their posts/a new civil war with the reintroduction of a chaotic republican government”. Sounds familiar….

Should anyone doubt Obama would be Nero, stay tuned. Given his Roman neoclassical column set design at the DNC, and Michelle Obama’s promise that Messiah-Hubby will fix our broken souls it won’t be long before he’s also having prophetic visions.

Just this past weekend, Missouri Governor Matt Blunt released a statement that leading Missouri prosecutors and sheriffs supporting Barack Obama were forming “Truth Squads” to intimidate and threaten his critics.

Enough is enough, or better yet, we’re mad as hell and we’re not going to take it anymore is coming from some in the secular press. And even more wonderfully strange, some of them are disgusted with the attacks, specifically, against those who lead a faith-based life, speaking out on our behalf.

“Will the American people be taken in by the Left? That’s the crucial question that will decide the historic election of ’08. Well, get off your duffs, friends. Conservatives must be activists. The big media will cover for Obama —- and all we have on our side are about 60 million intelligent voters who still think for themselves. That’s a good starting point, but it has to be turned into an electoral majority in the next six months. We must puncture the rock-star balloon of the most dangerous presidential candidate in fifty years. It can be done. It has been done with Dukakis, Mondale and Kerry. All we need to do is tell the truth”, urges James Lewis, his extensive body of work on American Thinker , a call-to-arms, or, at least a call-to-alarm that should be of interest to American Christians, pinpointing the dangers that liberal democrats present to not only a decent and civilized society, but to the annihilation of Christianity itself.

Lewis admits, “I’m not a believer myself, but all of us are inheritors of this extraordinary civilization —- unless, of course, we choose to be ignorant.”

“Our media class is secular and Leftist. Secularism has long been accepted in American life. Historically, secularism was prevalent in Greco-Roman times, during the Renaissance, and in the Western Enlightenment. But one can be a secularist, an atheist or agnostic and still respect the beliefs of others. Unfortunately, our media today are intolerant and bigoted against all “fundamentalism,” meaning all religions. Christians are just the easiest target for their bigotry. Media bias reflects Leftist fundamentalism. Sneering at religious people for being religious strikes me as impolite, superficial and profoundly ignorant. It is the bigotry of the Left. But any form of bigotry harms our sense of unity as a people. Our media should reflect the strong tolerance of the American people”.

We, those who are believers, should be thankful that Lewis is being used of the Creator, Jesus Christ, to warn us, to encourage us to remember against whom Ephesians 6:12 says we battle, and Lewis superbly lays out the spiritual battles we face, especially if one substitutes Biblical language for the secular-psychology language Lewis uses. Replacing “psychopath” with “depraved mind” or “reprobate mind” and “personality disorder” with “sinner”, gives the following article a Bible-focus that should send chills up your spine, clearly warning us to not slumber.

Helpful verses to give further perspective include: Prov 15:26, Phil 3:18-19, Psalm 4:2, Rom 8:5-7, Psalm 10:4, Jer 4:14, Matt 15:19-20, Psalm 13:2-6, Rom 12:2 and Romans 1:28-32.

John Piper’s sermon on The Final Judgment is also helpful in understanding, as Piper states, “The real issue of life is not one’s race or job or status or salary or looks or religious form. The real issue is whether one does good or does evil.” Lewis lays out the evil which Obama and the Clintons have followed – that of Saul Alinsky for whom the enemy is “normal decent Americans”.

Barack Obama and Alinsky’s Rules for Psychopaths – By James Lewis

“… the community organizer … must first rub raw the resentments of the people; fan the latent hostilities to the point of overt expression.’ — Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals

THERE IS ONLY THE FIGHT —- An analysis of the Alinsky Model.” — Hillary Clinton, BA Honors Thesis, Wellesley College, 1969.

“(Barack) Obama worked in the organizing tradition of Saul Alinsky, who made Chicago the birthplace of modern community organizing….” — The Nation

A psychopath is a person without conscience; someone who constantly breaks the moral rules of the community. Saul Alinsky was a “community organizer” who found a career that fit that personality disorder. In the Orwellian upside-down world of the Left, community organizers disorganize communities. That is the meaning of revolution, to overturn whatever exists today in the raw pursuit of one’s own power.

Alinsky boasted about his close alliance with Frank Nitti, Al Capone’s second in command in the Chicago Mob during the 1930s. Al Capone’s Mob were domestic terrorists, and not for any noble cause either. They poisoned the Chicago politics of their era. Alinsky’s close alliance with Frank Nitti tells us something crucially important today. Alinsky was also a lifelong ally of the Stalin-controlled Communist Party, at a time when Stalin was known to have murdered tens of millions of people. He was proud of building a bridge between organized crime and the power hungry Left. That tacit alliance may continue today.

Alinsky’s personality fits the definition of a psychopath — someone who has no guilt or shame toward others. But Alinsky also discovered how to teach psychopathic behavior to college students. That is the key to his success: To persuade hundreds of thousands of ignorant young people that it is much more moral to be immoral. Or, as Bill Ayers famously said, “Bring the Revolution home; kill your parents.”

Bill Ayers is now a highly influential professor of education. That is not an accident; it reflects a deliberate program of radical agitation and propaganda through the school systems. If you want to know who brought down American education, Bill Ayers is part of the answer.

A lot of the Boomer Left is marked by psychopathic behavior, in politics and in the rest of life. That is why the actions of the Left are so shocking to many of us.

Alinsky’s disciples — including Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama — have a warlike political style. They learned politics as war from the Master. Obama is so well-trained in Alinsky tactics that he used to teach workshops on it. That is why Obama can knowingly violate Federal law against usurping the presidential power to negotiate with Iraq before ever getting elected. Actual election to head of state by the voters means nothing, just as it means nothing to Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer, who have negotiated with Syria and the Muslim Brotherhood in clear violation of law while serving in Congress.

Teaching hatred for the normal majority is the key to power for radicals. But Alinsky taught that you can’t easily hate millions of people. To do that effectively you need a one-person scapegoat to focus all your hatred on. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” That is the politics of personal destruction, and it doesn’t matter if the target is black like Clarence Thomas, or a woman like Sarah Palin, or a severely wounded war veteran like John McCain.

That is why Obama is now instructing his followers to “get in their faces” of those Americans who are not down for his cause. Obama acts like a nice guy, but he is a political warmonger. He’s been very clear about that: “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.” That’s the language of gang war.

Today we can see the Left’s rage reaction to John McCain’s choice of Sarah Palin. The New York Sun quoted one feminist saying “All of my women friends, a week ago Monday, were on the verge of throwing themselves out windows …People were flipping out. … Every woman I know was in high hysteria over this. Everyone was just beside themselves with terror that this woman could be our president — our potential next president.”

The “comedienne” Sandra Bernhard suggested that Sarah Palin would be “gang-raped by blacks in Manhattan” if she dared to go there.

A British Leftist writing for Pravda (!) called “Sarah Palin – The Devil in disguise…

Sarah Palin, Mrs. Nobody know-it-all shreiking cow from Alaska, the joke of American politics, plied with a couple of vodkas … cheap little guttersnipe … suppose you shut up … you pith-headed little bimbo from the back of beyond … So next time suppose you keep your mouth shut and while you’re at it, make sure the members of your family keep their legs shut too. … “

That warlike rage has been systematically whipped up over decades by the Left. That’s what college “Women’s Studies” does, just as “Black Studies” is deliberately designed to whip up black rage and victimhood. Michelle Obama’s Princeton thesis is a case in point.

Alinsky called ordinary Americans “the enemy.” Normal people don’t declare war on all of society. But Alinsky wrote in Rules for Radicals that radicals

“…have contemptuously rejected the values and way of life of the middle class. They have stigmatized it as materialistic, decadent, bourgeois, degenerate, imperialistic, war-mongering, brutalized and corrupt … They are right … “

Normal, decent America is the enemy for these people.

Obama and Hillary are lifelong followers of Alinsky. They use his tactics and ideology. That is why American politics became the politics of personal destruction when the Boomer Left came to power.

These claims require proof; but we have been looking straight at the evidence since the first Clinton term. Bill Clinton fits the diagnostic description of psychopathic personality, now relabeled “antisocial personality’ in the DSM IV, the official diagnostic manual for psychiatry. Three out of the following seven criteria nails the diagnosis:

  1. Failure to conform to social norms …
  2. Deceitfulness … or conning others for personal profit or pleasure;
  3. Impulsivity or failure to plan ahead;
  4. Irritability and aggressiveness … ;
  5. Reckless disregard for safety of self or others;
  6. Consistent irresponsibility … ;
  7. Lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another.

I would give Mr. Clinton credit for Numbers 1, 2, 6, and 7, and possibly 3 (impulsivity) and 4 (irritability and aggressiveness). Dick Morris, who advised the Clintons for 20 years, describes dramatic scenes that certainly fit the description. Or Bill’s inability to stick with a meeting agenda, impulsively running endless bull sessions at the White House. As for 5, his picking up women opportunistically and in a way that put his career, not to mention his family life and American security, at risk. The Monica affair showed an impulsive, reckless president who got into power by endless lying and conning.

Liberal Democrats used to be normal Americans before the Boomer Left rose to power. Hubert Humphrey and Harry Truman had a strong sense of American morality. They despised the Stalinist Left and fought to keep them out of the Democrat Party. They were sensitive to ordinary shame and guilt, the emotions that make us civilized. When Bob Dole asked “Where is the shame?” in the 1996 presidential election, the answer came out: Not in the modern Democrat Party. People without guilt or shame make merciless power mongers.

Normal people slow down in School Zones where kids might run across the street — not because they’re afraid of getting a speeding ticket but because they can’t stand the thought of hurting kids. They don’t need to cheat compulsively on wives and husbands to prove how irresistible they are. Normal people have internalized some modesty and humility, and are capable of respect and love for others. A common feature of psychopaths is the inability to feel authentic love and respect for others.

True psychopaths are often charming, seductive, and treacherous. They make natural con artists. Many psychopaths are extremely manipulative — and what is more manipulative than stirring up hatred among victim groups to empower oneself? That is Jeremiah Wright, the diabolical Father Pfleger, James Meeks, and by his own definition of radicals, Saul Alinsky.

The worst are “malevolent psychopaths” — people who sadistically hurt others. Hitler and Stalin, Kim Jong Il, Pol Pot, and probably many famous Western intellectuals fit the description of malevolent psychopaths. That is tragic and shocking. Historian Paul Johnson presents compelling evidence for malevolent psychopathy in the life of Jean-Paul Sartre, for example, and many others in his important book Intellectuals. Western intellectuals have been the home team of Leftist radicalism for a century now.

But the single most important point about Alinsky’s “community organizing” strategy is that normal people can be trained to act like psychopaths: To become convinced that a “higher morality” allows them to act without conscience. As Alinsky wrote admiringly about V.I. Lenin, well known as a large-scale murder leader:

“Lenin was a pragmatist; … he said that the Bolsheviks stood for getting power through the ballot box but would reconsider after they got the guns!”

That is a laugh line, believe it or not.

Alinsky called this “pragmatic radicalism.” He differed from his Communist friends only in being more practical and less ideological. Alinsky was a radical because it suited his personality, because it was fun, brought him power and influence, and made him feel good. He was very clear in saying that, and he inspired the Boomer Left to follow his lead.

Alinsky dedicated Rules for Radicals:

“… to the very first radical . . . who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer.”

If that doesn’t send a shiver down your back, you haven’t been paying attention.

James Lewis occasionally blogs at

Source: American Thinker

  Textile help